who makes out the elephant? disagreement among urban planning theorists’ claim on rationality
نویسندگان
چکیده
rational knowledge-claims, consisting of theoretical propositions expressing a judgment about complex urban problems, are not new. the audiences, i.e. the public whose lives are affected by such claims, have begun to question the claims of rationality in urban planning. in response, each urban planner, believing in a particular theory or point of reference, endeavors to challenge competing theories in order to make his or her own view legitimate. each refers to a point of reference as being self-evident. through this skillful manipulation, planners tacitly justify their own claims as reasonable, plausible, inevitable, etc. these efforts actively suppress all opposing views and consequently portray one particular rational narrative as the complete emergent one. in this context, the competition among urban planners reminds us of the allegory of the blind people and the elephant. although, in this article, we do not attempt to provide yet another visionary theory, we claim that there exists no visionary position among planning theorists. the planning literature during the past two decades points to such competition between urban planners on the subject of rationality of plans. could planners build consensus among themselves before they ask the public to do so? here, a discourse between urban planning theorists is compared with the tale of the elephant. this article, using the above-mentioned allegory as a method of analysis, looks for the possibility of consensus building between two famous contemporary american schools of planning thought. points of reference of these two schools of thought are categorized and discussed. it is also found that no visionary position exists among planners which explain why people have doubts over planners’ claims to rationality.
منابع مشابه
Who Makes out The Elephant? Disagreement among Urban Planning Theorists’ Claim on Rationality
متن کامل
the effect of using visual aids on the development of speech act of disagreement among iranian intermediate efl learners
abstract the present study tried to investigate the effect of visual aids (films) on the development of the speech act of disagreement among iranian efl intermediate learners. to this end, the researcher selected 40 homogeneous intermediate learners based on their scores on oxford placement test. .the subjects then divided into control group and experimental group. both classes were tested by ...
تردید در وجود تلقی جهان‌شمول از عقلانیت در رویه‌های شهرسازی
There is a deep-seated belief among planners that the historical association between urban planning and rationality is an unquestioned presumption which they follow their daily practices based on. It seems that truth of urban planning claims has been shown predominantly by applying the concept of rationality. As a result, reflection on rationality can be taken into consideration as an importan...
متن کاملAdolescent-parent disagreement on health-related quality of life in food allergic adolescents; who makes the difference?
BACKGROUND Food-allergic adolescents are at highest risk for food allergy fatalities, which may be partly due to compromised self-management behavior. Such behavior may be negatively influenced by conflictual situations caused by adolescent-parent disagreement on the adolescent's health-related quality of life (HRQL). Comparisons of adolescent-self-reported and parent-proxy-reported HRQL of foo...
متن کاملCholesterol treatment with statins: Who is left out and who makes it to goal?
BACKGROUND Whether patient socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education) are independently associated with failure to receive indicated statin therapy and/or to achieve low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapy goals are not known. We examined socio-demographic factors associated with a) eligibility for statin therapy among those not on statins, a...
متن کاملHealthy urban planning in practice: experience of European cities Report of the WHO City Action Group on Healthy Urban Planning
Healthy urban planning means planning for people. Healthy urban planning – a WHO guide to planning for people (Spon Press, 2000) introduced the concept and principles of healthy urban planning. This book describes the efforts of a group of cities in the WHO European Healthy Cities Network to introduce health in their urban planning practices. Six city case studies covering a wide range of appro...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهرجلد ۷، شماره ۱۲، صفحات ۱۹۱-۲۰۱
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023